Home > Uncategorized > Champions League Ratings up 30%: Anglophiles Weep

Champions League Ratings up 30%: Anglophiles Weep

Well look at what happens when the American football loving public isn’t subjected to an all English final with the team missing from last year full of petulant whining children like their former coach. Wednesday’s final provided ESPN 300,000 more US viewers and a 30% spike in ratings. Over 1.4 million households watched the Champions League Final in the United States, a number that beats many daytime Major League Baseball telecasts on the network.

For years now we have been told that for football to succeed among an English language audience in this country it must be of the English variety. We received more hype in this country about the Chelsea-Man United final than we had for any previous final since 1999 when it was thought by some that Manchester United’s heroic victory over Bayern Munich was a victory for the game in the United States. This came even though the only player that day who would ever suit up in MLS featured for Bayern not United.

We’ve been preached too about the quality, skill and presentation of the English game to detriment of all others including our own domestic leagues and national team. But on Wednesday the football fans who prefer to watch English language telecasts spoke with their viewership. No English Premier League match has ever had so many viewers in the United States.

While an emphasis on English football is important to growing the popularity of the game in this country, other European leagues provide more skill and arguably equal levels of entertainment. They should all be paired together as part of a pie, not presented as competitors or somehow lesser versions of the game. As I discussed on this week’s Mad About Football show, much of the Anglicization of the world football press is done more out of Hubris than any other factor.  Much of the English language football press in the US buys the lines that come out of British papers and British football shows lock stock and barrel.

American viewers also demonstrated with the high popularity of the Euros which was missing England altogether (some commentators myself included believed the Euros would bomb on American TV without England’s qualification) that they get world football not just the anglicized version of the game.

Part of the tragedy of World Cup 2006 on American Television is that ABC and ESPN felt they had to spotlight the England team so frequently. The Three Lions not only bored American audiences to death allowing detractors of the beautiful game here at home to pen irresponsible, xenophobic columns, but ABC failed to highlight Argentina, France, Spain and the other sides playing open and exciting football until it was obvious England was not going to win the World Cup.

We were told Dave O’Brien made the World Cup unwatchable, but O’Brien’s biggest issue probably was being forced to call so many absolutely dire England matches. Had O’Brien been given the opportunity to cover Argentina or France at an earlier stage of the tournament perhaps he would not have received so much scorn from the American football press, much of it obsessed with England.

A parting thought on the Champions League on ESPN.  Perhaps it was the European bias of Derek Rae and Tommy Smyth that has me thankful ESPN will no longer carry the Champions League. Both formerly commentated on MLS matches, but only Smyth could have been called truly objective. Rae’s history calling New England Revolution, Metrostars and ESPN MLS games showed he had a lack of tolerance for football not of the European standard, and was nothing but condescending to the American game. (It should be pointed out that Adrian Healey is one of the most pro American announcers around with MLS and USL/A-League PR experience himself and that he will be missed.) No doubt that Rae is a professional, but he was the wrong voice for an American audience.

Perhaps it was the ticker at the bottom updating us on the score of the Red Sox-Orioles game that was annoying. Or maybe it was just an aversion to a network that has treated football as an ugly stepchild in classic American fashion. Whatever the case I am very grateful the Champions League is headed to the News Corp family of networks next year where the event will be treated as the worldwide phenomena it truly is.

NOTE: Typically my full length feature articles appear at Major League Soccer Talk.com but this particular article could not be uploaded there and thus is appearing on this site.

Categories: Uncategorized
  1. Are you joking?
    May 31, 2009 at 4:56 pm | #1

    Nobody cares about the Spanish league. A few care about the Italian league. So one Spanish team that shouldn’t have been in the final beat an English team. Four of the top five sides in Europe are still English. England’s national team is breezing through qualifiers. Many Americans know we will never be much of a soccer country so why not take the lessons from our forefathers and adopt the old country. IF England wins the world cup or eueos again it would be a big event in this country. Spain, Germany, Italy, France isn’t the same.

    The Premier League is the most popular league in the world and the most popular league in the US hands down. MLS is utter rubbish. I don’t have a team near me so why should I support it? The US team plays in CONCACAF which is a bore. I wish them well but cannot watch them beat up on Antigua 12-0. As the world evolves more and more americans are finding their english roots and adopting the old country. As we get more into soccer we realize our links are with england not germany, france or other countries.

    This is an angry, vile piece of blogging which borders on slander.

  2. May 31, 2009 at 7:30 pm | #2

    lol, sorry Kartik had to laugh at the first response, “are you joking”.

    BTW great piece and sorry to discover readership at MLStalk will not have the same opportunity those following you at the Kartik Report are privy to.

    I’m still awaiting proof from those claiming the numbers of EPL dominance to step forward without their foot in their mouth.

  3. May 31, 2009 at 7:39 pm | #3

    Nobody cares about the Spanish league. A few care about the Italian league.

    Where do the 300,000 American viewers come from wise guy?

    If England wins the world cup or eueos again it would be a big event in this country. Spain, Germany, Italy, France isn’t the same.

    I guess we’ll never find this out for sure.

    The US team plays in CONCACAF which is a bore. I wish them well but cannot watch them beat up on Antigua 12-0. As the world evolves more and more americans are finding their english roots and adopting the old country. As we get more into soccer we realize our links are with england not germany, france or other countries.

    So because you don’t like the part of the world we are in you won’t support your country? Why don’t you just move to Europe then and support England? We have play in CONCACAF because we are in NORTH AMERICA NOT EUROPE

    The Premier League is the most popular league in the world and the most popular league in the US hands down.

    The Mexican League gets the highest TV ratings in the US by a wide margin.

  4. GHT
    May 31, 2009 at 8:42 pm | #4

    Great piece of writing! I disagree on Derek Rae, but everything else is right on the spot!

  5. Kevin
    May 31, 2009 at 11:13 pm | #5

    That first comment is a joke. “so why not take the lessons from our forefathers and adopt the old country” Um our forefathers left England. How many people are finding their English roots? You do realise that this country is becoming more Hispanic don’t you? I’m part English and prefer other countries like Spain. God help us if we keep following the English model. The EPL is proving that no matter how much money you throw at a team you can’t buy trophies. The EPL is getting boring, guess who’s going to win next year? I’ll give you four guesses. Finally, the second line of this post fits the first person’s post perfectly. Good article Kartik and good job on putting this guy down.

  6. Anonymous
    June 1, 2009 at 12:19 am | #6

    Another pet peeve that Kartik fails to mention. Why did ESPN insist on only showing English teams live in the group stages?

    Hopefully FSC will mix it up a bit.

  7. EPL = Bottom 16
    June 1, 2009 at 3:38 pm | #7

    Are You Joking is probably one of the FSC or ESPN execs whose been forcing this EPL Kool Aid on us for years now.

  8. June 1, 2009 at 10:30 pm | #8

    Good stuff, but Dave O’Brien would have called Messi the A-Rod of World Football and Maradona would have been compared to Babe Ruth.

    O’Brien was horrid.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.